BLOG

Category : WHAT IS GOING ON

THE 2030 AGENDA THE ELITES PLAN FOR MANKIND
2021-10-26
pagina-o-face

The “World Economic Forum (WEF) is the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation” and it yields an extraordinary amount of power to shape world economic policies because it controls the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. In accordance with their official website (1): “The Forum engages the foremost political, business, cultural and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. Basically, WEF is the organization that defines the globalist elite agenda for the world and includes members like George Soros, Prince Charles, Charles Schwab, etc. It was established in 1971 as a not-for-profit foundation and is headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland”. “WEF claims to be “independent, impartial and not tied to any special interests. The Forum strives in all its efforts to demonstrate entrepreneurship in the global public interest while upholding the highest standards of governance. Moral and intellectual integrity is at the heart of everything it does.” The WEF is not impartial and independent because it intervenes very actively in the internal affairs of independent nations (2,3) for example opposing BREXIT and the election of USA president Donald Trump. The main interest of this article is centered around the Forum main economic plans as stated on: their “2030 Agenda” or 8 predictions (targets) for the world for 2030 or what they also called the Great Reset (3).

 

The 2030 Agenda or the great reset (3,4)

 

To explain the 8 points of the WEF’s agenda we will use their video available in YouTube (4) and the WEF’s document in their webpage (3). The following are the 8 points stated by the 2030 agenda:

1) “You will own nothing and will be happy. You will have to rent everything you use”. It sounds like the abolition of private property.

2) There will be a global price on carbon this will make fossils fuel history” Too bad for the countries that are oil producers but it will be supposedly good for the environment.

3) “The USA will not longer be the number one superpower. The World will be controlled by a handful of global powers” That sounds like very bad news for the USA and very good for China

4) “Farewell hospital, hello home-spital. Organs will be created and donated”

5) “You will eat much less meat” Bad news for Argentina and Brazil and big meat eaters but good news for vegetarians.

6) “A billion people will be displaced by climate change. And followed by their document comment (threat?) “We will have to do a better job at welcoming and integrating refugees” (3,4). It implies massive migrations, social engineering and nations yielding their sovereignty to world organizations whether their citizens like it or not.

7) “You could be preparing to go to Mars” We should ask the Martians because might not like it.

8) “Western values will be tested to the breaking point” An implied threat to free speech, democracy, free markets and capitalism.

 

What does the 2030 agenda means for us common world citizens?


Let’s understand the meaning of the 8 goals stated by the WEF

1) “You will own nothing and will be happy. You will have to rent everything you use”.
 

It is not clear whom we are going to rent from? The State? Big-Tech companies? The background information provided suggest that people will be so mobile that people will not belong anywhere and for that reason they will not need to own anything. No farms and not family homes. It sounds like the abolition of private property and the implementation of one of the most important goals of Orthodox Communist countries such as Cuba where all belongs to the State. Human rights are strongly associated to property rights: serfs and slaves owned nothing (2). It will be interesting to see how they can reach that goal by expropriation or by heavy taxes on private property or by changing the system so much that everybody will be depending of the state or a combination of the three.

 

2) “There will be a global price on carbon this will make fossils fuel history”
 

The logic for this goal assumes that fossil fuels are bad for the environment. Let’s look at the facts: the combustion of fossil fuels associated with transportation and energy production are close to 25% of the total green house gases emissions to the environment. There is strong correlation between CO2 concentration in the atmosphere and an increase in the planet’s temperature or global warming. However, there are many other factors associated with global warming but it is clear that the combustion of fossil fuels is one of the main contributors to this phenomenon. It makes sense that we need to reduce fossil fuel consumption for the benefit of the environment. However, there are 3 other important factors producing greenhouse gases such as: agricultural practices and land deforestation causing around 27% of greenhouse emissions, the emissions from humans and cattle another 27% and the rest from many other sources including industrial emissions of CO2 from industries such as cement and the production of fertilizers. All of these factors are driven by the most important factor of all human population size and growth. We have to be honest if we want to save the planet we need to control population growth, size and consumption.

 

Eliminating fossil fuels might sound pretty but it will not stop global warming. Forcing people to use electric cars by using government-centralized measures like communist countries do is not the answer to save the planet. Electric cars depend on the energy from power plants that also have to be from renewable sources to have any impact on emissions. No country in the world will be capable of producing all their energy from renewable sources unless we make major breakthroughs in Nuclear Fusion Power. And electric cars batteries are an environmental nightmare. The rational solution is to combine the energy from different sources including nuclear energy and fossil fuels and compensate the emissions with reforestation plans and agricultural practices bringing carbon back to the soil.

 

Goal 2 might sound good, however totally eliminating fossil fuels within in a short period of time it is very radical. The premise to justify the use of extreme measures is a coming environmental catastrophe because of global warming. This impeding doom creates a sense of urgency that will allow the WEF elite to implement their agenda. Its main purpose seems to empower world institutions to impose economic controls to force nations states to yield their sovereignty and to compel their populations to change their economies and move from free market policies to centrally planned economies. It does not look for middle of the road solutions that can be more effective and it will destroy the economies of the countries that are oil producers. Above all does not address a reduction of the world population that is the main source of global warming.



Bibliography:


[1] https://www.weforum.org/about/world-economic-forum


[2]  


[3] https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/8-predictions-for-the-world-in-2030/


[4]  


[5] http://www.unityforallamericans.com/en/george-soros---is-he-the-puppet-master-behind-global-divisions-and-a-new-order.php


[6] https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/the-newest-james-bond-movie-is-hollywood-showing-us-what-global-elites-are-up-to/


[7] https://articulos.mercola.com/sitios/articulos/archivo/2021/10/12/lesiones-por-vacuna-anticovid.aspx?ui=f8a04cf62e496869477a28c60ec1c10d7e9ce7c4886742d0213a7a9728a82d2c&sd=20200801&cid_source=espanl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20211012&mid=DM1009151&rid=1290196965


[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum


[9]Timothy Garton Ash. Davos man's death wish Archived 21 August 2008 at the Wayback Machine, The Guardian, 3 February 2005.


[10]Samuel Huntington. "Dead Souls: The Denationalization of the American Elite" Archived 14 September 2016 at the Wayback Machine, The National Interest, Spring 2004.


[11]Marshall, Andrew (20 January 2015). "World Economic Forum: A History and Analysis". The Transnational Institute. Retrieved 9 August 2021.



COMMENTS



  • Message
  • Register

Enter your message



* Required data.